As I think a bit 'all know, there is a festival of blasphemy to Big Brother. We've already heard two oaths, maybe three. For the first there was a blasphemer 'pardon' means the direction considered voluntary and not his blasphemy in a humorous context. After this' episode, he showed up another competitor of the last edition under the pretext of having to apply the same criteria for judging and you can include in this edition. The management has opted for the yes and he entered. In the episode on Monday, was suspended because another competitor televoting blasphemed. The authors thus decided to send home all three blasphemers (both two of this edition is the last) and has attracted competitors to adopt attitudes less vulgar and more responsive to public view.
Obviously, everything is a great writer: quite a while Big Brother keeps losing plays and, in the light of all this, the authors revive the strategy of the controversy and scandal to purchase plays, frankly strategy as old as the cuckoo . All this is clearly false and engineered to perfection, but not without current applicants: Please note that our Prime Minister told his militia to lobotomized a pathetic joke, that was not funny at all, with blasphemy final icing on the cake. Before then, all those who said they had a curse (although it was not intended as a mere figure of speech in the Region of membership of the competitor) have always been turned away. Until the 70s anyone who said a bad word or even just a girl who had a dress a bit 'shorter was hunted for years. Now, however, little women seminude dancing, vulgarity, profanity, double meanings, and so on and so forth on the agenda: a program with no swear words or protruding corners of girls is not considered a worthy program to attract a large audience. As the newspaper Avvenire and people are outraged by this blasphemy, should be shocked as to how these shows indecent.
But back to our Silvio. The purpose of this whole charade put on by Big Brother is prepared to 'educate' citizens / subjects in a language never became part of the common way of speaking, in a nutshell, Silvio continues to throw fuel on the fire to make blasphemy a normal thing, or at least acceptable, forgivable, understandable at times. I well remember that a lady wrote a letter to Milan Republic setting out its dismay in front of an episode that has seen the holiday: it seems that the lady had heard the child of neighbors umbrella miss a subjunctive (what is acceptable to a child who, if persists, it will be in good company), the mother did note the error and aunt (the child) said "What does it mean? mistaken relatives of those Big Brother and one we can not be wrong?" . This is the situation that Silvio want create a habit for some things that make headlines, a real porprio 'training' to ensure that its not more scandals, but normal. It seems that he is succeeding in its purpose very well: after helping to destroy the correct gramamtica Italian (Has only given a hand in putting programs around so low and vulgar, I would not dream of giving the current sgrammaticatezza only to Big Brother, striped, etc.), now Silvio strikes again. In addition, to complete his plan, in itself perfect and evil, has ordered production to swear much beloved by the public, people whose removal would have caused anger and protest. In doing so, not only the public will see them as heroes unjustly affected, but also as models, as characters to imitate, to get ideas. His dream is just that: make people think "what's wrong if Berlusconi has blasphemed? If Peter the Great Brother do it why could not he? ".
This is obviously just a poor test of genius and megalomania of dell'astuzia of this character. Its aim is certainly not bring down some barriers, it would be a hero if so, and we consider ourselves very lucky if the worst thing it does is to curse two illiterate fools. Of course, using the same tactics even more important with regard to matters such as to speak on talk shows and always Realities of violence against women , respect for women, respect for homosexuals, respect for religion, for political ideas and to race when he was the first to disregard any of the following things. The error of the dictatorship in the past has been to demonize a symbol, a person, a figure and total bandwidth so that everyone would embrace this symbol / person / idea / figure was to be imprisoned. In so doing, it creates curiosity about what the band, creates desire to learn, create subversive even if you do not have faith in the ideology but out of pure rebellion. Silvio instead was smart to understand this and understand that everything must be repeated be banished to the extreme, day and night, qualunquizzandola, customs clearance, making it trivial, ridiculous, monotonous. This is the 'government of doing' of Silvio Berlusconi.
0 comments:
Post a Comment