We are now
in 2011, age unthinkable for many. In the history of cinema and literature has always been written or shot with a good book or movie with a title on a year far away, in which he described a beautiful future and terrible at the same time. I can think 1984 written in 1948, 2001: A Space Odyssey shot in 1968 but inspired by The Sentinel of Arthr Clarke always written in 1948, or in the years '40-'50 I, Robot by Isaac Asimov. All described a distant future for the time, a future of unbridled progress, artificial intelligence, more advanced than human machines who rebel, who have feelings that take center stage in humans, travel to Jupiter and other crazy unthinkable even now. Apart from the intrinsic meaning of these films or books, most of the things described did not take place. But I think there was a book that provides all of this.
course I'm referring to 1984. I already wrote an article about this full-bodied adding the difference Huxley's Brave New World (for those interested can find it here ). But I did not look very stressed in my opinion is very important. Anyone who has read the book can easily reach the conclusion that Orwell foresaw the invention of cameras and TV sets and use the same mass as a means of lobotomized. But more importantly, in my opinion, is the function that had their television screens. They projected the individual in a virtual reality where he could be closely monitored. Most were harassed by this technological control of the Outer Party members who were to just work without knowing in any manner the functions and purposes of the Ministry. Members of the Inner Party instead had the privilege to switch off their TV screens when they wanted provided it did not exceed the half-hour shutdown. Were exempt only those who had a role and close collaboration with the Great Brother and the last of the social scale, the Prolet convinced that they could not wait any kind of rebellion. Note the difference between fiction and reality?
E 'notice that the TV is only a tool for rimbecillire the population without betraying a minimum of culture, except for some decent films in very exceptional cases. The result of this general rimbecillimento is shown very well in the video posted in the previous article that I can not remove from the mind. The TV has produced millions of heads, unable to think or to have their own autonomy, has produced a single abnormal mass, formless, devoid of everything. There is no question of a single program, it is useless to talk yet another indifferent and unproductive type "is the fault of Big Brother," is the fault of Tg1, "is to blame Open Studio '. This is something intrinsic to the TV, in the transcendental concept. The TV connects thousands and thousands of people in a single program, single frequency and blend very well regardless of the program. All that is known to many. Unfortunately, the myth of free internet and the network as the only free media has collapsed. lbero The network is not, in fact, is replacing television as a means of lobotomized. There are places where it is proposed real stupid, we are Sites created for the sole purpose to annoy other users, others are created only to spread insecurity and foolishness. The Internet, however, is culture. If you made good use can really be a powerful mezzo.Purtroppo There is a downside.
Internet is constantly monitored by the police claims that apply passed over in silence. Once a user is logged on a platform you activate a mechanism by which the webmaster is improper and the police post your IP address and then it is easy to trace the phone number and even, in extreme cases even to VAT, social security number, IBAN number and credit card. In most sites on the Internet, particularly social networks, and applies a real porpria dittarua from the creator. On social networks, upright to free information and a tool of rebellion, there is a complaint and all are under a tremendous infallible virtual control. In so doing we always have a world population, not Italian, and all recorded under control so that you know all their movements. An easy criticism of my comment will be something like: "It 's a generalizing discourse. On the Internet there is the loser who has nothing to do, there is the stupid girl trying to flirt with boys more possible, but on social networks also run a lot of information that on TV not buy ever. Many have opened my eyes thanks to information from the web. Then on Facebook and social networking are also enrolled many leftist groups and anarchists who do not even have certainly nothing to do with the current government. " I respond immediately.
I do not question that Facebook, like everything else in the world, has its positive and negative sides. E 'half impersonal and overpowering, the triumph of globalization made in USA. It is also a company for profit, every user, every post is a gain in monetary terms for the owners. It also does not dispute that some people with ideas not to throw you can register, but in this case will be monitored as a pawn. I would like to fly on the revolutionary discourse of Facebook, bamboccioni ridiculous, that fill the mouth with words they do not know the meaning and the rebels want to do because extremists "is cool" papering the page with posters of Che Guevara or Mussolini, but people who want to make something serious not lose their time on Facebook. If by chance someone falls potentially dangerous, it is still under close control and, indeed, in more than half will be identified.
So the prophecy is fulfilled with a mix of Orwell and Huxley Asimov. All under strict control, no way out and the worst thing is that users sign up "to their will," without any coercion. Instead their will does not exist. E 'destroyed by hours of TV, rivers of words about gional on the reputation of Facebook and how it can be "useful and important." The true prophet on the fate of humanity is not Jesus let alone Muhammad. E 'Orwell. They are buying everything and everyone. The system encompassing and overpowering fear of a united people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment